South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem's disclosure of killing her 14-month-old dog Cricket in her new book has ignited widespread criticism and backlash.

Even figures within former President Donald Trump's circle, including Steve Bannon and Donald Trump Jr., have questioned Noem's judgment.

Bannon labeled her actions as "a little too based," while Trump Jr. deemed the incident "not ideal," raising concerns about her suitability as a potential running mate for Donald Trump.

The revelation has drawn condemnation from politicians and dog experts alike, USA Today reports.

Critics argue that Noem's decision to shoot the puppy reflects poor judgment and raises doubts about her leadership capabilities.

Experts specializing in hunting dogs suggest that alternative methods, such as training or seeking assistance from breeders or rescue organizations, should have been explored before resorting to euthanasia.

Noem has attempted to defend her actions, framing them as tough decisions necessary on a farm.

However, her justification has been met with skepticism and further criticism from both Democrats and conservatives, with some likening her to the villain Cruella de Vil from "101 Dalmatians."

READ NEXT: Governor Kristi Noem Faces Lawsuit Over Viral 'Smile Texas Ad' Video 

Political Ramifications and Fallout

South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem's revelation has not only sparked public outrage but also jeopardized her political aspirations, particularly regarding a potential vice-presidential candidacy.

Observers within Trump's orbit view her actions as detrimental to her political career, diminishing her chances of securing a prominent role in future administrations, according to AP News.

Despite attempts to portray herself as a decisive leader, Noem's handling of the situation has been widely criticized, with some questioning her judgment and leadership qualities.

Within Trump's inner circle, Noem's disclosure has been perceived as a significant misstep, with implications for her political future.

Some argue that her actions have irreparably damaged her reputation and credibility, making her an unlikely choice for any prominent position in Trump's administration.

Concerns have been raised about her ability to navigate political challenges and effectively represent Donald Trump's interests on a national stage.

Assessment of Noem's Response

Noem's refusal to apologize and her attempts to justify her actions have further fueled criticism and skepticism.

Critics argue that her handling of the situation reflects a lack of accountability and political acumen, raising questions about her suitability for high-profile roles in government.

While some supporters have attempted to downplay the controversy, others view it as a significant setback for Noem's political ambitions, The Daily Beast noted.

Admission of shooting South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem dog Cricket has sparked intense scrutiny and condemnation, casting doubt on her political future and leadership capabilities.

The fallout from her revelation has reverberated throughout political circles, with critics questioning her judgment and suitability for prominent roles in government.

In the aftermath of the controversy, Noem's experience underscores the caution needed in sharing personal matters in politics and highlights the critical role of adept crisis management.

READ MORE: Private Meeting Between Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis Held in Florida 

This article is owned by Latin Post.

Written by: Ross Key

WATCH: Politicians, dog experts vilify South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem for killing her dog - From Associated Press