In a closely divided 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court granted permission on Monday for Border Patrol agents to resume cutting razor wire along a section of the US-Mexico border, intensifying the ongoing Texas border razor wire case between the Joe Biden administration and Texas over immigration enforcement measures.

The decision allows agents to clear concertina wire installed by Texas along the banks of the Rio Grande to deter illegal migration, despite concerns about injuries to migrants and potential hindrance to border patrolling, Yahoo! News noted.

The lack of explanation for the justices' votes in the one-page order leaves the specifics unclear. The Joe Biden administration views this ruling as a temporary victory while the legal dispute over the razor wire persists.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott had authorized the deployment of razor wire, asserting that its absence encourages risky border crossings and complicates the tasks of Texas personnel at the US-Mexico border.

The lawsuit remains ongoing, with the governor's spokesperson, Andrew Mahaleris, affirming Abbott's commitment to defending Texas' property and constitutional authority for border security.

READ NEXT: Texas: 3 Migrants Drown at Rio Grande in Attempt To Enter US 

Biden Administration's Argument and Court Decision

The Joe Biden administration argued in court that the razor wire obstructs Border Patrol agents from reaching migrants during river crossings, emphasizing that federal immigration laws supersede Texas' independent efforts to manage migrant flows.

Justice Roberts cast the deciding vote, with Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh in dissent, according to Fox News.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, appointed by Trump, aligned with the majority, although no explanations were provided for the votes on the Texas border razor wire case.

The majority of the razor wire is deployed in the Shelby Park area of Eagle Pass, owned by the city but recently seized by Texas.

Border Patrol agents have been restricted from accessing the park since then.

Brandon Judd, President of the National Border Patrol Council, expressed concern that the ruling on the Texas border razor wire case could encourage more illegal immigration, diverting agents from addressing criminal elements crossing the US-Mexico border.

"Unfortunately, this means Border Patrol agents are going to be tied up dealing with give-ups rather than going after the criminal elements that constantly cross our borders illegally," Judd said.

Emergency Exception and Ongoing Legal Proceedings

In the ongoing Texas border razor wire case, the administration contended that the limited emergency exception posed a serious risk to human life, citing a recent incident where one woman and two children drowned, per Bloomberg Law.

"It is impossible to say what might have happened if Border Patrol had had its former access to the area-including through its surveillance trucks that assisted in monitoring the area," the government told the court on January 15.

Meanwhile, Texas argued that fencing serves as a deterrent, guiding individuals to lawful ports of entry.

The Texas border razor wire case is scheduled for argument at the Fifth Circuit on February 7, where the court will decide if Texas can prevent the Border Patrol from altering the barrier.

Recent Supreme Court decisions have generally favored the administration's authority over immigration matters, and Texas faces additional legal challenges over its border-related policies.

Congressional negotiations on US-Mexico border security have also gained attention, with House Republicans linking the issue to foreign aid for Ukraine.

The broader debate over immigration policies and enforcement measures continues on multiple fronts.

READ MORE: Texas Blocking Border Patrol From Patrolling Area Where Migrants Cross 

This article is owned by Latin Post.

Written by: Bert Hoover

WATCH: Supreme Court allows federal agents to cut razor wire installed by Texas on US-Mexico border - From KENS 5: Your San Antonio News Source